\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
Printed from https://gwfrog.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
steven-writer's Portfolio
Preferred Author
S🤦‍♂️ Author Icon
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
Minimalist. Focus on technical. I also look at how a work would fit into the traditional publishing landscape. I don't use a template. Warning: I am Australian, and so cultural differences may apply.
Registered Author
S.J - Not Around Much Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm honest when I review thing I'll say what's on my mind but at the same time I try to stay positive and will always tell you what you did right but this means in no way am I a professional reviewer so take my reviews with a grin of salt please
Registered Author
The Uplifting Essayist Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Friends, 1. I always like to look at the positive aspects of the story I am reviewing and highlight them. 2. This is because I firmly believe in the principle, "The best building is that building which stands on the strongest foundation." 3. And I believe that the strongest foundation, in the case of a story, is that of appreciation and gratitude for its author. Essayist
spidergirl's Portfolio
Moderator
spidey Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I attempt a well-rounded review where I look at the item from a writer's and reader's perspective. I'll tell you what I liked and what I think could be strengthened. I like to think I'm a courteous and helpful reviewer.
aundria_k's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Angels in my Ear Author Icon
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I enjoy reviewing and try to be as honest as possible. I look for specific things such as technical merit, flow and lyrical quality in poems, creativity, tone, and mood. Though I can be a tough critic, I strive to encourage writers to grow and challenge themselves. I feel that it is through constructive criticism that we grow as writers. I strive to give the writer feedback on the overall impact of the piece. I am the host and judge of the "Shadows and Light Poetry ContestOpen in new Window. and co-host of the "Roots & Wings ContestOpen in new Window.
Preferred Author
Lexi Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am honest, but kind and encouraging. I will offer ideas if something strikes me.
Preferred Author
Marvelous Friend Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Honest and simple
elfmage7's Portfolio
Moderator
Dawn Embers Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Disclaimer: I am not good at remembering to do requested reviews. Often I have busy things going on with work and my own novels, so sorry if I decline or don't remember to do a review in the short time given. Just a warning. When I review: Long. Depending on the type of story and reason for review I tend to get anywhere from 4,000 characters to on the rare occasion over 10,000. I will make overall comments, technical points and even offer sources when necessary but a lot is dependent on what I'm reviewing. I can even do a full edit but that's take a lot of niceness and time.
puppetmaster84's Portfolio
Preferred Author
The Puppet Master Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will say what I liked about your piece and if I have any suggestions for improvement. My reviews are usually short, sweet and to the point. I prefer to review short stories but will look at poetry if asked to.
jotokai's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Joto-Kai Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like a review that makes me edit, even if it bothers me or offends me. So I look at your piece with, "What would I change to make this better and why?" And I write down most of what I think... the limit being how much you paid, more than how much you can handle! And of course there's no guarantee that my advice won't make it worse. Well, except the long list of bestseller credits-- oh, I haven't published them yet. But feel free to request a refund if I really like your piece. It's happened, sometimes I'm in too good of a mood and I think your work is perfect. If it was, you'd be submitting it for a royalty advance... praise is nice but it's like Chinese food, you need more in an hour. Whereas critique sticks to your ribs...
teegate's Portfolio
Registered Author
TeeGateM Author Icon
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
My approach is balanced and constructive. I begin by highlighting what works well in a piece—what captured my attention, moved me, or felt particularly well written. When needed, I provide suggestions for improvement, which may include identifying spelling or punctuation issues, or noting where adjustments could improve rhythm and readability. I sometimes comment on passages that might be unclear or seem out of place, always with the intent of helping the author strengthen their expression and flow. For me, the heart of good writing lies in its emotional resonance. I often ask, “Did you feel it?” or “How did it make you feel?”—not because the writer instructed the reader to feel a certain way, but because the words themselves created a genuine emotional response.
supersonic's Portfolio
Registered Author
Supersonic-Hyper Writing Turbo Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will write a detailed review of your item that goes into detail about the positives and negatives of your item. I color code each section so everything is easy to see once you view your review.
coolzebra's Portfolio
Registered Author
meepgra Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
When I review something, I look for grammar and it's content. I can say what you miss or what you need.
Registered Author
Robrayl Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My review style is personal, structured, and emotionally driven. I aim to balance honest praise with thoughtful, constructive critique, always offering suggestions that help strengthen the work. I try to keep my tone respectful and supportive because I believe feedback should encourage, not discourage. My goal is to help writers grow, not just improve one piece.
jankedyman's Portfolio
Registered Author
Ethan Wolverton Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'll read your writing, and dissect it line-for-line adjusting any grammar, flow, spelling, etc. I will also give my general opinion of your piece. I will never insult you and will point out the good and the bad. I am very nit picky so if you don't like that then I suggest you move on. However, I believe I am capable of improving your writing technique, quality and overall style.
tadpole1's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Tadpole1 Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Depends. Sometimes, in depth, and sometimes, "just the feel of the item."
jordanateaton's Portfolio
Registered Author
Rowan Oakenscale Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm honest and supportive, but I will give advice about things I THINK would help beef up your writing (up to my standards, which aren't very high).
orchidslvr2914's Portfolio
Registered Author
Theodora Clayton Imogen Eliott Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Is honest, encouraging, motivating and helpful with revisions.
dalericky's Portfolio
Registered Author
Dale Ricky Author Icon
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
I start with the reader experience - did the story pull me in and keep me engaged? From there, I'll dig into what worked and what didn't, focusing on the elements that impacted my experience: character motivation, pacing, whether the emotional beats landed. I use 5 key questions to structure my feedback when needed, but my goal is always to help writers see their story through a reader's eyes. I don't edit for grammar or spelling, but I'll flag it if it pulls me out of the story.
Registered Author
Charles Nasby Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will give the kind of review that I wish people gave me: rather detailed with emphasis on areas that need growth and areas that are pretty good already. And I'll review pretty much anything, whether a poem or an entire novel or anything in between. Admittedly, though, I do tend to be absent-minded, so it does happen that you might have to resend me the review request, but I promise I'll get around to it eventually.
Printed from https://gwfrog.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers